top of page
average rating is 2.4 out of 5

Thriller

2022

Lucid

In 2039, a man suffering from a variety of mental illnesses that make him unfocused and paranoid has locked himself away in his apartment. His doctor gives him an experimental form of treatment in the form of a chip that can be inserted into a port in his neck. This tech quickly turns out to be a very unsafe prototype, causing the chip to negatively affect his mind to a severe degree.

Update Film

Review This Film

Be a Critic Every film here was made by a student who took a risk. Your job is to engage with it seriously — rate the craft, write something honest, and mean it. Scores are blind until all reviewers are in. Nobody sees anything until everyone has spoken. That's the deal.

Score: —

average rating is 3 out of 5

Word Counter

Prestige:

Error Message:

Success Message:

Writing

Directing

Acting

Cinematography

Editing

Producing

My Critic Score

0

Reviews

The Verdict Every score you see here was written without anyone knowing what the others would say. No groupthink. No piling on. Five independent voices, revealed all at once. Read the reviews, not just the numbers — that's where the real feedback lives.

Lucid Brings Focus To Student Acting

Reviewer Name

Critic Score

T

1

T

2

average rating is 1.7 out of 5

This project has a really interesting premise and the acting was quite good, better than most. The cinematography was a bit underexposed, which was disappointing. The story is quite simple and effective. I could hardly hear the dialogue however.
Still, I really enjoyed seeing where you took this concept, since it's not all that far technically from the future we are headed towards.

LUCID - Interesting for 2022

Reviewer Name

Critic Score

T

1

T

2

average rating is 3.2 out of 5

jumping into the future

Lighting - Good -
Audio quality - a little low hard to hear
Special Effects for 2039 interesting
Editing Good.

Stuck In Sleep Mode

Reviewer Name

Critic Score

T

1

T

2

average rating is 2.2 out of 5

Promising story even though thematic elements were not very present. Edits were good although a little basic. Effects helped and did not get in the way. Sound was a little soft. Hard to hear the music, even though appropriate, became a distraction. Some dialogue was lost. Lighting, however basic, was not a distraction. Acting was consistent. Nice variety of camera work.

Lucid Review

Reviewer Name

Critic Score

T

1

T

2

average rating is 2.2 out of 5

The editing and camera work needs attention. better use of practical and foreground lighting to separate the actor from the bright and dark backdrops of the window will greatly enhance the look and feel of this short. Audio is too quiet at some points.

Slow but steady

Reviewer Name

Critic Score

T

1

T

2

average rating is 2.7 out of 5

Good story, but a little slow getting started. Good video skills

Comments

Say Something Every filmmaker on this platform is putting real work out into the world. If this film moved you, challenged you, or made you think — say so. Comments are for encouragement and honest reactions, not ratings. Those happen elsewhere. Be the community you'd want reviewing your own film.

Comment Error:

Submit Comment

Comment contents

User name

Date

Add paragraph text. Click “Edit Text” to update the font, size and more. To change and reuse text themes, go to Site Styles.

Add a Title

Add a Title

Add paragraph text. Click “Edit Text” to update the font, size and more. To change and reuse text themes, go to Site Styles.

Add a Title

Add a Title

Similar Films

Escapism

On The Fence

Breakout

For the Flower Girl

BUZZKILL!

bottom of page